tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post1279542327674238504..comments2023-06-26T07:30:16.539-04:00Comments on Pornonomy: Quickie Reviews: Three Comedies and a DramaRoger Feelberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16743088463839032445noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post-5451099429953068142010-06-15T11:49:55.711-04:002010-06-15T11:49:55.711-04:00Yay - quickies!
I've been wanting to see Raw ...Yay - quickies!<br /><br />I've been wanting to see Raw Talent for a while, thanks for reviewing it. I love movies about movies, and of course from a porn scholar perspective I especially love porn movies about porn - there's something extra interesting about porn that talks about itself.<br /><br />Nice to see some intelligent disagreement about that Nurses movie - makes me want to see Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post-44763780443863676372010-06-10T10:00:48.622-04:002010-06-10T10:00:48.622-04:00I think it'd be great to hear your counterpoin...I think it'd be great to hear your counterpoint! I strongly encourage you to get a review together, but, like you mentioned, it might make the most sense to do it as a comparison to the new parody.Roger Feelberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16743088463839032445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post-3336393527022349632010-06-09T15:06:51.536-04:002010-06-09T15:06:51.536-04:00I found Specs to be the least interesting characte...I found Specs to be the least interesting character. <br /><br />I do agree that Jon Martin didn't seem to me to be either TJ or BJ; otherwise, it just looks like there's not much for us to agree on in this movie. <br /><br />When (IF ever), I do a review, I'll give you a link in the review as the opposing viewpoint. <br /><br />I'm thinking about saving it to contrast with the X-Ray Specshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05339892716277197142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post-5079923961778527282010-06-08T10:10:38.947-04:002010-06-08T10:10:38.947-04:00Well, I'll agree with you on the "charact...Well, I'll agree with you on the "character driven" part. My problem was that the characters just weren't that interesting. Obviously, Paul Thomas's "Jaybird" was the "Hawkeye Pierce" character (and, like I said above, in my opinion Thomas underperformed in the role), but Jon Martin's "John" was hardly a "Trapper John" or "B.JRoger Feelberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16743088463839032445noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8037061498674152514.post-78317402720954414642010-06-07T18:26:15.675-04:002010-06-07T18:26:15.675-04:00Roger, we're going to have to agree to disagre...Roger, we're going to have to agree to disagree on "Nurses of the 407" since I personally found it to be an excellent example of how to make a good parody (and here's hoping the new XXX spoof of MASH won't turn out to be a disaster like the XXX parody of The Big Lebowski). As far as the story, I thought that Nurses of the 407 was character driven much like the TV show. X-Ray Specshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05339892716277197142noreply@blogger.com